The drilled well
Ninety metres through two rock layers, cased and sealed, plus the test pumping that proves the yield before anyone celebrates. Quote 2027-114.
Bilan Valley has water 90 metres down and no way to lift it. The community has already dug the trench route and pledged the land; what is missing is a drilled well, a solar pump and the pipe to reach the four hamlets.
The trench route, dug by hand by 60 households over eleven weekends before we were involved at all.
Six line items, quoted by the contractor in March and published here with the quote reference. Nothing on this page is an estimate we made up.
Ninety metres through two rock layers, cased and sealed, plus the test pumping that proves the yield before anyone celebrates. Quote 2027-114.
A pump sized for 340 households at 40 litres per person per day, with panels, controller and a spare pump held in the district store. Quote 2027-118.
To four hamlets, with twelve tap stands and the fittings. The trench is already dug, which is what makes this figure so much lower than usual.
A 30,000-litre tank on the ridge so the taps still run for two days if the pump fails. Villages without this are one breakdown from being back where they started.
Four people from the valley trained as pump caretakers, paid for a year by the water committee, plus the toolkit and the first set of spares.
Two site visits, the engineer's report, transfer fees and the audit. That is 4.8% of the total, and it appears on this page rather than in a footnote.
Measured across this project, not across the charity as a whole — a blended average is how overheads get hidden.
If the project finishes under budget, the balance goes to the same committee's next tap stand rather than into general funds — and you get an email telling you so, with the number.
Updated on the first of every month whether or not there is good news. Two of the entries below are delays.
Two hydrogeologists, three test bores. Water at 88–94 metres, yield sufficient for 340 households with room for growth. Report published in full, including the bore that came up dry.
Land donated by four families, trench route agreed, and a water committee elected with six of eleven seats held by women — a condition of our involvement, agreed before any money moved.
The only rig in the district was on a government contract. We told donors the week we found out rather than at the end of the quarter, and rescheduled for April.
Ninety-one metres, tested at 2.1 litres per second — above the design figure. Invoice and test certificate published on the reports page the same week.
The trench is dug and the pipe is quoted. This is the step your donation pays for, and it is the one that turns a well into water in the hamlets.
Twelve tap stands commissioned, caretakers certified, and the committee takes over operation with a year of spares in the store.
Three things you can verify without taking our word for any of it.
Contractor invoices, receipts and the bank statement for the project account go up monthly with the reference numbers intact. You can ring the drilling company and quote them.
An independent auditor reviews the project account annually. The last two reports are on the site including the one that flagged our record-keeping on fuel receipts as inadequate.
The water committee owns the well, sets the maintenance fee and can remove us from the project. We fund and advise; they decide. That is the arrangement, in writing.
"We dug the trench before anyone promised us anything. That was the point — we wanted to be able to say the work was already half done when we asked."
"I give to three charities. This is the only one where I have seen an invoice, a delay explained before I noticed it, and an audit that says something went wrong."
"My daughters walked ninety minutes each way. When the taps run they will walk four. That is the whole thing, and it does not need a longer sentence."
The work continues at the pace the money allows — the well is already drilled and paid for. If we are still short in December, we lay the pipe to two hamlets instead of four and say publicly which two and why. Nothing is returned to a general fund and no donation is spent on a different project.
In the countries where we are registered, yes, and the receipt you get within the hour is the document your tax office needs. Elsewhere the receipt still itemises everything correctly, but you should check locally rather than take our word for it.
Yes, and monthly gifts end automatically when the project is handed over — we will not quietly roll you onto the next one. To stop earlier, reply to any email with the word stop. There is no retention call and nobody will ask you to reconsider.
Because a project with no engineer, no site visits and no audit is how wells end up broken within two years. Charities advertising "100% to the field" are usually funding those costs from a different pot and not showing it to you. We would rather print the number.
A maintenance fee set and collected by the committee, four trained caretakers, a spare pump already bought and stored, and a district supplier who stocks the parts. We check back at years one, three and five and publish what we find, including failures.
Visits are possible twice a year in a group, at your own cost, and only when the committee has invited them. Goods are almost always worse than money — shipping a pump costs more than buying one two hours away, and it takes work from a local supplier who will service it later.
Give once or monthly. You get a receipt within the hour, the monthly report whether the news is good or not, and a message when the taps run.